Understanding the key steps in clinical trial participation

Participating in a clinical trial involves several steps before you can officially take part. The process begins with screening, which determines your eligibility for the study. If you pass this stage, you move on to enrolment. It’s crucial to understand the distinction between these two stages in clinical trials, as each serves a different purpose.

When researchers plan a clinical trial, they need approval before recruiting participants. After receiving approval, the recruitment process begins. However, researchers must first screen potential candidates before enrolling them. Screening consists of two phases. Initially, candidates complete a form or participate in an interview, which serves to qualify them based on preliminary criteria. After this, a more thorough screening process is conducted for those shortlisted, ensuring they meet all the necessary requirements to advance to the next stage.

Screening starts when you express interest in a particular study. The first step, known as pre-screening, might involve completing a form on the trial’s website or participating in a phone interview. If you meet the requirements for pre-screening, you’ll proceed to the actual screening stage. At this point, a healthcare provider reviews your medical history and conducts a physical examination. In some cases, laboratory tests might also be required, depending on the trial’s specifics. These steps ensure that only suitable candidates advance to enrolment, minimising risks and improving trial outcomes.

Once you pass the screening stage, you move to enrolment, signifying your eligibility for the study. This process begins with informed consent, where the researchers provide detailed information about the study, including the drugs used and potential side effects. You must review and sign documents, confirming your understanding of the risks involved. Informed consent is a crucial step, as it ensures that you’re fully aware of the nature of the trial before participating.

There are several differences between screening and enrolment. Screening serves to filter potential participants based on the criteria established by the researchers, assessing their health and overall suitability for the study. Enrolment, by contrast, marks the beginning of your active participation in the trial once you’ve passed screening. Timing is another distinction, with screening happening before the study begins, while enrolment occurs after all eligibility checks are complete.

At the screening stage, you’re not yet committed to the trial. You can withdraw at any time, especially if any physical exams or tests raise concerns. However, once you enrol, your involvement becomes more formal, as you’ve begun treatment or are about to receive medication. Documentation and consent also differ between these stages. While you may sign some forms during screening, formal informed consent is only required at the enrolment stage, once you’re ready to participate fully.

Additionally, your interaction with the clinical team evolves. During screening, your contact is limited to a healthcare provider conducting tests or interviews. However, upon enrolment, you’ll regularly communicate with researchers and report any symptoms or side effects throughout the study. This closer involvement with the research team is a key aspect of the enrolment phase.

Both screening and enrolment play vital roles in patient safety and trial success. The screening process ensures that participants meet all eligibility criteria, safeguarding against health risks that could arise during the trial. Enrolment, with its emphasis on informed consent, educates participants about potential risks, further enhancing their safety. Additionally, a successful enrolment phase is critical to the trial’s progress, allowing eligible individuals to begin treatment under the study’s guidelines.

Once screening confirms your eligibility, the decision to enrol is up to you. After providing informed consent, you begin your journey as an active participant in the clinical trial.

hVIVO plc (formerly Open Orphan plc), led by Cathal Friel, is a rapidly growing specialist contract research organisation (CRO) and the world leader in testing infectious and respiratory disease vaccines and antivirals using human challenge clinical trials, providing end-to-end early clinical development services for its broad and long-standing client base of biopharma companies.

Click to view all articles for the EPIC:
Or click to view the full company profile:
    Facebook
    X
    LinkedIn
    hVIVO plc

    More articles like this

    hVIVO plc

    hVIVO 2024 Year in Review

    Discover how hVIVO Group’s innovative approach to human challenge trials and infectious disease expertise has shaped the future of pharmaceutical research in 2024.

    hVIVO plc

    Blood biomarkers for viral infection diagnosis and management

    Host response biomarkers to viral infections have significant potential in clinical applications, such as guiding diagnostic decisions, reducing unnecessary antibiotic use, and triggering infection control protocols or antiviral treatments. Research on these biomarkers has largely focused

    hVIVO plc

    Impact of patient perception on vaccine and drug efficacy

    Human viral challenge studies have become essential in evaluating the effectiveness of vaccines, treatments, and prophylactics, providing quicker results compared to larger Phase 2a/b field trials. hVIVO has developed various challenge agents for human use, including

    hVIVO plc

    Versatile MDCK cells in research and biotechnology

    MDCK (Madin-Darby Canine Kidney) cells are an essential tool in biological and medical research, especially in virology, cell biology, and studies involving membrane transport. Originally derived in 1958 from the kidney of a healthy adult female

    hVIVO plc

    Exploring the human viral challenge model for influenza research

    This study evaluates the human viral challenge model using the A/Perth/16/2009 H3N2 influenza virus, involving 216 volunteers across five clinical studies. Administered intranasally under controlled conditions, the research aimed to improve the understanding of influenza infection

    hVIVO plc

    Advancing influenza research with new challenge agents

    Controlled Human Infection Studies (CHIS) have proven to be essential in exploring human responses to respiratory infections and testing the effectiveness of vaccines and treatments. These studies hinge on selecting an appropriate challenge virus, making a